THIS IS VISIT
TO THIS SITE
ABOUT THIS WEBSITE―PLEASE READ
THE NAME: The
title
of this site reflects the nature of its subject matter and content. It
does not represent
the name of an organization or legal entity.
The subject matter and material published on this site are provided
by a number of individual contributors. Some of those
contributors prefer to remain anonymous and use pseudonyms.
THE SPONSOR: The present
sponsor of the site is LoneWolf Press, L.L.C.
and is an independent company. It is not legally
connected to nor affiliated in any way with the Association of Unity Churches, the former
Unity School
of Christianity now using the business name unity®, any
other unity organization, or group using the name "Unity."
Its publishing activities are not confined solely to the Unity
movement but encompass a wider range of subjects and also uses other
venues. Any ideas, beliefs, or opinions expressed, including
those found in the historical source material, do not necessarily
represent those of the sponsor.
FINANCING: In keeping with
the Unity tradition established by H. Emilie Cady as well as Charles
and Myrtle Fillmore, it is the intent of the sponsor,
to trust in “the innate honesty and justice of all men and
women,” and rely on the voluntary
freewill offerings and gifts
of
those who have an interest in and care about the preservation,
publication, and promotion of the history, heritage, and traditions
of the Unity movement for primary financial support of this
project. There will be fees associated with some
offerings to cover costs of production, distribution, and any
royalty payments that may be due content contributors.
Please note, under the current sponsorship donations for supporting this work do not qualify as tax deductible
under provisions of the IRS code. This restriction may
possibly change at sometime in the future.
DEDICATION:
This site is dedicated to the inspiration, the vision, the hope, and
the faith, of H. Emilie Cady, Charles and Myrtle Fillmore, the
Fillmore family, James Dillet Freeman—and to all those others who
worked so hard for so many long decades in service of the Master,
Jesus (Yeshuah) the Christ, to spread his Truth and create the spiritual
movement of Practical Christianity under the banner of Unity—also
to the one who lost his way on the path and his life, who when
asked, “what can we do to revive and keep alive the Unity that was?”
answered saying, “Honor the Heritage,
that is all we can do, Honor the Heritage.”
PURPOSE: The
intent
of this work is to Honor the Heritage of the Unity
Movement. To ensure that all those
who devoted their service to the cause for which Unity once stood did
not labor in vain. Our function is to research,
solicit, collect, preserve, publish and make generally available
documentation, information, inspirational writing and commentaries
relating to Practical Christianity, the traditional Unity movement inspired by Charles and Myrtle
Fillmore, its antecedents, and the goals it was intended to achieve.
We hope to
create and provide an extensive library of useful references and resources to any and all who value the
heritage, principles, and traditional teachings of Practical
Christianity from the Unity
perspective, for those who seek to instruct, lead studies, or
individuals who have an interest in learning about the movement's
foundations and its mission.
ADVISORY:
It is not the purpose of this project to advocate that
individuals accept or adopt any particular facet of Unity principles
or teaching. The founders of the Unity movement
deliberately did not author dogmas, doctrines,
rules, canons, or creeds. They sought to avoid the
creation of traditional ecclesiastical structures and were adamantly
opposed to the ecclesiastical institutions of churches (as they have been known) or
a priesthood. Every individual is left to find
and confirm the Truth imparted by the Holy Spirit and Christ
presence within them to define his or her own personal credo.
The diversity of
ideas and opinions that come from this lack of imposed structure
and the latitude
given has been both the blessing and the curse of the movement.
But that is the Unity way and it can be no other way—when
personal liberty and freedom of choice for good or ill are restricted the free will imparted by our
creator is thwarted.
COPYRIGHT
©
NOTICE AND PERMISSIONS: Commentaries, essays, editorials,
poetry, and articles, by contemporary
writers, other contributions such as audio and photographic media as well as selections,
adaptations, summaries, excerpts, arrangements,
collections, compilations, and anthologies of public domain material
are subject to Copyright © by LoneWolf
Press, L.L.C. or individual contributors. Permission is granted to
download, forward, print, copy, otherwise reproduce, or
distribute website content for the individual and personal use of
recipients with the stipulation that none of this material may be
used or exchanged for monetary remuneration, offered commercially for sale,
or in any way used for financial gain.
QUESTIONS AND ISSUES ADDRESSED: It is
surprising to find that there are so many differing opinions
and disparate ideas as to the true nature of Practical
Christianity and the Unity
Movement. There are fundamental Christian
groups who believe that Unity is not in accord with
basic teachings of Christianity and consider it a cult.
Some progressive New Thought groups are not at all
comfortable with Unity because of its traditionally strong emphasis
on the Bible, reverence for the personage of Jesus (Yeshuah) the Christ,
reliance on the teachings of Jesus as well as his apostles, and acknowledgement of
Christian religious reformers throughout the centuries.
NEW THOUGHT OR NEW AGE?: Unity is
commonly considered to be a part of the contemporary "New Thought"
movement. Public statements from contemporary leaders of
parent organizations representing the Unity movement
proudly confirm their “Oneness” with the New Thought
community and are seeking to form alliances with
New Thought organizations. I is probable that the majority of Unity
"ministers" and "congregants" or adherents believe they are part of
the New Thought movement. The neo unity® hosted a
“New Thought Community Retreat” for eleven New Thought organizations in the
Spring of 2004 and are actively involved with some of those
organizations.
Prior to this event, the last time Unity hosted a New Thought
conference was in 1920, eighty-four years before. Looking back to
March of 1922, Unity School of Christianity, under the
direction of Charles and Myrtle Fillmore, formally severed
their relationship with the International New Thought Alliance. They
chose not to be associated with or considered
to be “New Thought” and preferred
Unity to be known as Practical Christianity
and as part of the Truth Movement.
Although Unity organizational leadership in
this era seeks to divorce themselves from what they consider to be the stigma of the
"New Age" fringe, Traditional Unity is in reality a
Christian "New Age" reform movement. Unity
Farm, the original name of Unity Village before its
incorporation as a municipality in 1953, was in truth intended
to be a Christian New Age Commune. Any serious study
of the traditional writings support these contentions beyond any shadow of
doubt. Although Unity may include many elements similar to those
of "mental science" practices and pure New Thought philosophy, the Practical Christianity of
traditional Unity is not "mental Science" or New Thought in its theology and
this
position was consciously, deliberately, acknowledged and publicly
stated by the founders.
WHAT IS UNITY?: So,
what is the truth about the Unity
movement? What are its roots? On what foundation
does it stand? Is its philosophy and theology sound? On what key
principles is it based? What beliefs does it promote?
What are the basic teachings and practices? Is the Holy Bible
truly its basic text? Is it a modern, liberal, enlightened,
and practical Christian movement or something else? Is it a
denomination, sect, or cult? What was the original mission and
vision? What ends did it seek to achieve?
Is the life long labor of Myrtle Fillmore who was the true founder
of Unity to have gone in vain?
Was Charles Fillmore merely an eccentric metaphysical opportunist to be brushed
off and forgotten or a Prophet for our time?
WHY?
The
Practical Christianity of Unity
has a very unique place among religious
movements. It was born out of American theological philosophy and
practices. The fabric of Unity is woven in a pattern like no
other. It is one of a kind. To those who have come to understand the Christian theology and
philosophy upon which it is based, the significance of the principles, practices,
traditions, have been touched by the Spirit of Truth, and found their
inner Lord; the Unity Movement has become the final gathering place on their
spiritual journey, their spiritual home in this world. Should
the heritage of Unity be lost there would be nowhere else
for them to go or for others to find the same refuge.
If Charles Fillmore was correct in his
assertion that “Unity is a link
[not the last word] in the great educational
movement inaugurated by Jesus Christ” then it is
of great importance to preserve this link and avoid a break in the
chain. The Unity Movement
of decades past was a pillar of Kansas City society, a
strong spiritual voice in the nation, and broadly recognized.
It gained respect from diverse elements of our culture and religious
leaders from many denominations. Unity literature included a
number of publications, such as Wee Wisdom, that were widely distributed and acceptable
to numerous religious groups as well as the general public.
Unity’s message was once carried on nationwide, public radio and
television.
The movement no longer enjoys the same prominence,
prestige, and stature that it once did. Has it fallen from
grace? Can the movement
of Practical Christianity be revived to once again become an
influential force for Truth
in our society without sacrificing the principles upon which it
was founded? The answer to this question is up to
those of us that care. We are children of God; together we can make a difference!
THE POWER OF ONE:
"...Changes [for the better] can come from the power of
many, but only when the many come together to form that which is
invincible—The Power of
One."—Bryce
Courtenay